Leadership in Hotel Rwanda Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Leadership in Hotel Rwanda Answer: The basis of leadership: The five leadership aspects of the character Paul Rusesabagina in the film Hotel Rwanda were as follows: Confidence: A leader should be confident about his decision making power and about leading his followers. The refugees turned to seek guidance and help from Paul because he was confident about holding onto his humanitarian grounds. He gave refuge to the his neighbours irrespective of their origin and even nationality. He was confident about his humanitarian decisions and bribed the Rwandan army with alcohol and money. Paul as a confident leader protected the Tutsi and the foreign refugees, sheltered his family member and kept his premium hotel running. When his bribes could no longer save the refugees from the attack of the Hutus, he led them into the safety of the Tutsi Rebel lines. Positive attitude: The character displays infallible confidence in his humanitarian decisions to protect people in the face of Rwandan civil war. His confidence is perhaps the most prominent leadership aspect portrayed by the character Paul (Lyon et al., 2014). Paul saved the lives of the Rwandan in the face of the genocide. It is the merciful aspect of his personality and positive attitude that made others trust him. His positive attitude and extreme hospitality maintain discipline and motivation among his staffs up. Communication: The next leadership aspect of Paul is communication skills which supported his confidence. The film Hotel Rwanda shows political problems between the Hutu and the Tutsi tribes of Africa. Paul was a Hutu but was married to Titiana, a Tutsi, which showed his power to understand the human bond over racism. His power to communicate with a conflicting groups of people was the most unique feature of his personality which made other depend on him. He maintained healthy communication with his staffs which kept their morale and motivation high. Tactfulness: He gave bribe to the Hutu tribe who resided around his hotel to protect the refugees which showed his power to communicate with hostile people. His power to communicate with the refugees and eliminate fear from their minds also proves his communication prowess. He even helped the United Nations and the Red Cross by giving shelter to their refugees as well. He managed his staff so that they could keep the hotel running while he took care of the refugees. The staff respected him as a servant leader and admired him. They followed him willingly and kept the services to the guests going. Thus, Pauls quality of a servant leader kept the morale and discipline within the staff high. They admired him for his extreme hospitality and his tactful ways of protecting the refugees. Thus, it was extreme hospitality and servant leadership of Paul that kept the morale of the staff high. Commitment: Paul was committed to save the lives of the Rwandan against the merciless killing. It is leadership quality of his that helps him to lead the refugees towards safety of the Tutsi people. His commitment to upload humanity supported him even when his own family was threatened. He maintained morale and discipline with his staffs and sheltered them too. Extreme hospitality: Lashley (2015) in his work refers extreme hospitality as the act of offering shelter to strangers, give food an protection to guests especially when they are in need. It has religious and humanitarian importance and is one of the admired qualities of a leader. Extereme hospitality is one of the qualities of a servant leader who puts the protection and wellbeing of his followers before his own interest. Extreme hospitality necessitates a leader to provide protection to strangers and value their lives. Paul in the film practiced extreme hospitality when he gave shelter to strangers in his hotel. As a servant leader he put the protection and security of the refugees before all sorts of identities like race, nationality and religion. He protected the lives of the Rwandans against the genocide which killed lakhs of people in the country. He was a Hutu but did not differentiate between the refugees on the grounds of their origins (Lashley, 2015). Paul displayed servant leadership qualities when he protected the Rwandans instead of caring for his own family alone. As a servant leader he was more concerned about the well being of his refugees that following ethics blindly. He bribed the Rwandans with alcohol and money to ensure their protection. Paul used his resources to save and feed the refugees. This shows his extreme hospitality and humanism. As a participative leader Paul participated with the international bodies in the rehabilitation of the genocide affected people which showed his commitment to extreme hospitality. Welten (2015) in his work told that extreme hospitality urges one to cross the barriers of culture and nationality and reach out to the needy, even if they are strangers. Servant leaders show extreme hospitality and lead the people in trouble towards safety and security. They motivate refugees by protecting them and ensure their safety. Paul, in face of the lack of humane feelings and mass killing, protected the refugees (Shek et al., 2015). Hence he, showed extreme hospitality in the film by protecting the refugees of Rwanda genocide and ultimately leading them to safe shelters. Leadership style and followership Servant leadership is a unique type of leadership in which leaders put the interest of their followers before their own. Their aim is to lead the followers across the troubled times. Paul as a servant always put his servant before him. This leadership style is not encouraged by the aim to acquire wealth or recognition. It is fuelled by the urge to serve the needy people. This type of leadership is capable of building a society based on human values and justice (Shek et al., 2015). The character of Paul is the main character of the film Hotel Rwanda. He displays servant leadership and puts the safety of the refugees before his own safety. The leadership style of his encourages the leaders to take risks on behalf of their followers. They are able to lead anyone in the society out of trouble and are considered important leaders for social development. They are confident and dedicated towards their followers and win respect and trust from them (Wallis, 2014). The leadership style of Paul can be identified as service leadership style because he put the interest of his follower, the refugees before his own. The other leadership styles like participative leadership style allow participation of the team members in decision making on the target set by the leaders. Paul as a servant leader put the safety of the people before his own. He owned a premium hotel which attracted foreigners (Shek, Yu Siu, 2015). Paul, instead of allocating his resources solely towards the operations of the hotel to earn profit, allocated vast resources to protect the refugees. He allocated resources to protect them which became his main target. He even put his target to earn profit after his service towards humanity and saving the unlucky sheltered people (Hutchinson Jackson, 2013). An admirable leadership quality in Paul was the power to take decisions with confidence during the times of extreme risks. Bridges Bridges (2017) in their book tell that extreme leaders like Paul challenge the prevailing situations. They understand the loss caused by a certain situations and take steps to lead people towards better situations. Servant leaders are confident and their leadership stands on the servant and them helping each other. It provides one to show love and charity towards the society and goes on to create a society based on equality. The leaders have the quality of taking decisions in the face of tough situations. They are capable of taking ethically and morally sound decisions while leading their teams. They display both experience and emotional attachment with their followers while making judgements and taking decisions. They consider the impact of their decisions on their followers while making them. The servant leaders like Paul understand the conditions of their followers and consider their emotions important while deciding what to do (Watt et al., 2017). Paul as a servant leader is worth admiration because he put the security of the refugees before his own and decided to give them shelter (Liden et al., 2014). He instead of joining the Hutus in killing the Tutsis, sheltered them. This showed his confidence to go against the tide and stand beside the right even to the peril of his own life. The effect of confidence and risk taking leadership on leadership and followership is very profound. The servant leaders take the risk of protecting others and are ready to risk their own lives. They emotionally are able to feel the danger looming on the needy people and try to assure their security. The risk taking servant leaders try to lessen the pain of unlucky people by providing them mental and emotional support. Paul provided shelter to the refugees and gave them emotional support(Yip Ct, 2013). There are many works on leadership regarding the origin of the leadership qualities in leaders. The trait theory says that descendents from the rich and powerful families have leadership qualities owing their heritage (Antonakis House, 2014). The situational theories say that leaders acquire their leadership qualities under certain situations. Such situations challenge their leadership instincts to take decisions under tough conditions to lead their followers. Paul, is not a royal descent. He was an African who had a hotel business. He took the decision to protect the refugees when the other Hutus were killing them. Such types of leadership have tremendous effect on the followers and they gain trust and confidence in the leader. He had compassion for humanity and the suffering refugees(Li, Lin Wang, 2014). It can be commented over here that leadership has got nothing to do with royal or aristocratic birth. It stems from the power of an individual to understand situations and take a ccurate decisions to deal with it. The leadership of Paul had the traits of a servant leadership to a big extant and that of transformational leadership to a smaller extent (Dei, 2014). Thus, he transformed the common belief the Hutus had that the Tutsis should be killed (Nichols Cottrell, 2014). As a leader having risk taking power and decision making abilities he instilled a feeling of security among his refugees. Paul gave shelter to the refugees and led them to safety across the Tutsi lines. Here Paul as a transformational leader conceived the lives of the African as precious as the Americans. He did not leave his followers which led his followers to trsust him. He had the power to transcend the boundaries of race, caste and nationalism to uphold humanity (Barghouti, 2013). The movie can be stated as a link between hospitality and servant leadership. Pauls leadership is driven by compassion and feeling for people in pain. The leadership of Paul is born out of his humanistic and compassionate nature. He was a person who did not follow ethics blindly and bribed the army people to protect is refugees. He was a leader to who put humanity before business ethics and persona safety. References Antonakis, J., House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformationaltransactional leadership theory.The Leadership Quarterly,25(4), 746-771. Barghouti, O. (2013). Boycott, Academic Freedom, and the Moral Responsibility to Uphold Human Rights. Bridges, W., Bridges, S. (2017).Managing transitions: Making the most of change. Da Capo Press. Dei, G. J. S. (2014). Personal reflections on anti-racism education for a global context.Encounters on Education,15, 239. Hutchinson, M., Jackson, D. (2013). Transformational leadership in nursing: towards a more critical interpretation.Nursing inquiry,20(1), 11-22. Lashley, C. (2015). Hospitality and hospitableness.Research in Hospitality Management,5(1), 1-7. Lashley, C. (2015). Hospitality and hospitableness.Research in Hospitality Management,5(1), 1-7. Li, G., Lin, J., Wang, H. (2014). Rethinking identity and agency in minority education: Preparing Asian American leaders for a global future.New Waves,17(1), 50. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance.Academy ofManagement Journal,57(5), 1434-1452. Lyon, L. J., Nadersahi, N. A., Nattestad, A., Kachalia, P., Hammer, D. (2014). A curricular reform viewed through Bolman and Deals organizational frames.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,14(3), 16-33. Nichols, A. L., Cottrell, C. A. (2014). What do people desire in their leaders? The role of leadership level on trait desirability.The Leadership Quarterly,25(4), 711-729. Shek, D. T., Law, M. Y., Liu, T. T. (2015). Focus group evaluation of a service leadership subject in Hong Kong.International Journal on Disability and Human Development,14(4), 371-376. Shek, D. T., Yu, L., Siu, A. M. (2015). Interpersonal competence and service leadership.International Journal on Disability and Human Development,14(3), 265-274. Wallis, A. (2014).Silent accomplice: the untold story of France's role in the Rwandan genocide. IB Tauris. Washington, R. R., Sutton, C. D., Sauser Jr, W. I. (2014). How distinct is servant leadership theory? Empirical comparisons with competing theories.Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics,11(1), 11. Watts, L. L., Ness, A. M., Steele, L. M., Mumford, M. D. (2017). Learning from stories of leadership: How reading about personalized and socialized politicians impacts performance on an ethical decision-making simulation.The Leadership Quarterly. Welten, R. (2015). Hospitality and its ambivalences. On Zygmunt Bauman.Hospitality Society,5(1), 7-21. Yip, J. A., Ct, S. (2013). The emotionally intelligent decision maker: Emotion-understanding ability reduces the effect of incidental anxiety on risk taking.Psychological Science,24(1), 48-55.